Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016

Hip resurfacing is a less invasive form of joint replacement surgery which is advised to only selected individuals.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016.

Hip resurfacing a procedure that improves the function of your own hip joint may be a viable alternative to total hip replacement surgery. Additionally it also explores some of the possible advantages and disadvantages of hip resurfacing over hip replacement. Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive approach to hip replacement and involves removing only the affected portions of the hip joint.

These patients are too young for a total hip replacement because of the severe limitations after the surgery. The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis. Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. How does it compare to conventional hip replacement.

Hip replacement alleviates pain by removing the affected bones and cartilage and replacing it with a prosthetic implant that imitates the function of the joint. In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket. Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip.